Search for: "SULLIVAN v. SHIELDS CORPORATION" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2022, 6:27 am by Jeff Kosseff, Matthew Schafer
Recent Threats to Sullivan and Its Progeny Coral Ridge, which arose from the Southern Poverty Law Center’s characterization of a Christian ministry and media corporation as a hate group, was not a particularly good vehicle for overturning Sullivan. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:01 am by John L. Welch
But the Board's recent precedential decision in DaimlerChrysler Corporation and Chrysler, LLC v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 3:06 pm by Neil Richards
  That choice requires that we shield Westboro from tort liability for its picketing in this case. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 6:09 am by James Morphy, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP,
Editor's Note: James Morphy is a partner at Sullivan & Cromwell LLP specializing in mergers & acquisitions and corporate governance. [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE In SEC v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On 2 March 2022, Nicklin J gave an ex tempore judgment dismissing the libel claim in Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation v Burgis. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
Sullivan,” which “generally shields reporters and news platforms from libel or defamation lawsuits provided they were acting in good faith”; Thomas argued that “the high court was wrong to usurp the role of states in regulating libel. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:45 am by Laurence H. Tribe
Sullivan for deciding when the First Amendment shields whoever disseminates material damaging to the reputation of a public official or public figure from liability. [read post]
2 May 2018, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
At the Human Rights at Home blog, Margaret Drew suggests that after Jesner, “[k]eeping an eye on upcoming cases on the rights of individuals versus business entities will clarify how much corporate shielding the court is willing to do while eliminating some remedies for individual human rights violations. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court held that “government officials performing discretionary functions are generally shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 8:05 am by David Oxenford
  Beyond issues of bad publicity, attacked candidates are often reluctant to sue because of the New York Times v Sullivan standards that make it hard to prove defamation of a public figure. [read post]